1. Formation of Oil Deposits
Explanation
Lab exercise
Resources
Vocabulary
Assessment
Appendix
2. Seismic Testing
Explanation
 Lab exercise
Resources
Vocabulary
Assessment
Appendix
Unit Five Standards

Unit Five - Petroleum Exploration
2. Seismic Testing

Objectives - The student will be able to:

  • Explain why seismic testing is used in exploration.
  • Describe the advantages and disadvantages of seismic testing.
  • Describe how seismic testing is done.
  • Describe a seismic section.
  • Explain reflection and the information it provides.
  • Explain refraction and the information it provides.

Explanation

The seismic methods are the most widely used of all geophysical methods used in petroleum exploration. The main advantage is that it provides the most accurate rendition of the geometry of subsurface layers.  Unfortunately the cost of seismic surveys are much greater than the cost of other types of geophysical surveys.  Seismic methods measure seismic velocity of rock layers to detect both lateral and depth variations.  The objective is to determine the lithology and geometry of the layers.

A seismic wave can be thought of as shock wave (elastic wave) or vibration traveling through the ground.  The rate of travel, or velocity, of the wave is related to the density of the rock.  There are two types of elastic waves produced:  1) P-waves, which are primary or “compressional” waves, and 2) S-waves, or shear waves (Figure F24).

Figure F24:    Explanation of how A)  P-waves, and B)  S-waves are transmitted.

The procedure used is to lay out a survey line with geophones set at equal spacings along the line.  A shock wave is produced at one of the stations by dropping a heavy weight or detonating an explosion at a “shot point”.  The shot point is the point on the surface directly above the zone of interest.  Ground motions caused by the explosion or impact are transmitted in the form of P-waves and S-waves.  A “seismic timer” is used to measure the travel time of the wave from the instant it is generated until the time the wave reflection is detected back at the surface.  Times are measured for each of the successive stations along the line.  Either semi-graphical or computer methods are used to determine the velocities.

The reflections are plotted on a profile, called a seismic section, which shows depths to the features of interest (Figure 25).  Depths up to 20,000 feet can be measured routinely, with an accuracy level of 10 to 20 feet.  Average velocities cannot be determined for intervals less than a few hundred feet.  Seismic reflection has been used to map out the most common features associated with oil accumulations, such as anticlines, salt domes, reefs and faults.  Since different types of rocks transmit the shock waves at different velocities, the average velocity can provide important information about the rock composition (Table T10). 

Figure 25:    Typical seismic section showing interpretation of subsurface fold structure and faults.

Example

Velocity (km / s)

Attenuation  (alpha x 10 –6)

Granite:

   

   Quincy, Massachusetts

5.0

0.21-0.32

   Rockport, Maine

5.1

0.237

   Westerly, R.I.

5.0

0.384

Basalt:

   

   Painesdale

5.5

0.414

Diorite

5.78

0.21

Limestone:

   

   Solenhofen, Bavaria

5.97

0.04

   Hunton, Oklahoma

6.0

0.366

Sandstone:

   

   Amherst

4.3

0.71

   Navajo

4.0

1.77

Shale:

   

   Pierre, Colorado

2.15

2.32

   Sylvan, Oklahoma

3.3

0.68

Table T10:   Seismic wave velocities in selected examples of different lithologies.

The two main categories of seismic methods are “seismic reflection” and seismic refraction”.  The seismic reflection method seeks to measure the travel times of seismic waves or pulses after they have been reflected off of subsurface formations or structural features.  Information derived include the velocity (density) of the material and the depth to the reflective surface.  Seismic refraction is used primarily to determine seismic velocity.

Seismic Reflection
The Law of Reflection simply states that the angle of reflection equals the angle of incidence (Figure F26).  The technique is based on analyzing the arrival times of seismic waves (ground motion or energy waves).  After the sensor measures the precise arrival time of the wave, the velocity of the wave can be calculated using the hyperbolic equation (Figure F26).  The wave velocity, which is related to the rock density, can then be used to determine the lithology of Rock Unit 1.

Figure F26:   Reflection of a seismic wave.

Seismic Refraction

The seismic refraction method is similar to the reflection method in that the same instruments and shock wave sources are used.  However, as the name implies, the objective is to measure refraction of shock waves as they pass across formation or structural boundaries (Figure F27).  Refraction is governed by Snell’s Law, which relates velocity to the angle of incidence and to the angle of refraction. 
Measuring refraction requires that the detecting instruments be placed a large horizontal distance away from the shot point, or in other words, this distance must be much greater than the vertical depth to the horizon intended for measurement.  The results are far less accurate than those obtained with the reflection method, but velocity information (and hence lithologic information) is more reliable than that obtained by reflection techniques. 
 
Figure 27:    Comparison or reflection and refraction of seismic waves.

 

 

Field Methods | Geochemical Methods | Geophyscial Methods | Drilling Methods | Petroleum Exploration

DMTC Home | ISM Home